Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads

[Chris Stith]

On Fri, 4 May 2001, Benjamin Sugars wrote:

> On Fri, 4 May 2001, Chris Stith wrote:
> 
> > This is nothing but a workaround, but it's better than not having
> > threads.
> 
> Are you sure about that?  Think of all the tuits, energy, and p5p
> bandwidth that would consumed in an effort to attain such goals.  Then
> consider what else might have be acheived.

Let me rephrase. The end product is nothing but a workaround, but
it's better than an end product without threads. The workload
needed to arrive at such an end product is likely the best argument
against the approach.

Chris
 
-- 
Where there's a will, there's a lawyer.