On Fri, 4 May 2001, Alan Burlison wrote: > We might actually be better expending effort in providing a proper event > loop in perl - this is more likely to be achievable within the strictures of > the existing perl5 implementation, and if we are going to end up locking > everything anyway, it may not end up being any slower. Agreed. There are many other things with a higher utility/work ratio. This is not meant to denigrate the hard work that Artur is doing. I just don't see ever being able to access any more than a subset of Perl from threaded perl. I hope I'm wrong. Cheers, -Ben -- signer: can't create ~/.sig: File exists
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jens-Uwe Mager
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jens-Uwe Mager
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- One more time Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: One more time Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
