01-05-04 17.07, skrev Doug MacEachern p� [EMAIL PROTECTED] f�ljande: > On Fri, 4 May 2001, Artur Bergman wrote: > >> If this is such a big problem, then mod_perl is in for major breakage as >> mod_perl uses ithreads for mod_perl 2.0 and Apache 2.0, mod_perl is from my >> understand of major importance for perl, and if it will break badly then >> something needs to be done. > > apache-2.0 includes a prefork mpm (behaves just like 1.x, no threads), > mod_perl-2.0 works with that mpm with or without ithreads. so worst case, > you get 2.0 functionality without threading. but, i think it is worth > taking a run at making threaded-2.0 usable in a production > environment. something that was *impossible* without ithreads. > > Indeed, but it will still be pretty unusable on win32. But I agree, I think it is worth taking a run at making it work, that is why I am trying. Artur
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jens-Uwe Mager
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jens-Uwe Mager
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- One more time Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: One more time Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Doug MacEachern
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Artur Bergman
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
