On Fri, 4 May 2001, Chris Stith wrote: > In a completely Open Source world, we wouldn't have to worry, as > (almost) everything would be rebuilt around the new version of the > library anyway. You've lost me. We want perl to build on both the old and the new. > If you serialize the calls, then anything that happens inside the > binary library doesn't happen at the same time between threads. > Period. If you wait until one call to localtime() has returned > before making another, for example, then the two calls cannot > possibly interfere with one another. I do not think this is true. The first call can return a pointer to static data. Subsequent threads can clobber this data. Cheers, -Ben -- signer: can't create ~/.sig: Level 3 halted
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Gurusamy Sarathy
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Dan Sugalski
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Andy Dougherty
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Benjamin Sugars
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Alan Burlison
- Re: our :shared $foo / iThreads Chris Stith
