I already did that. I ran it on the Cookbook code. Yes, some things didn't work out for such reasons as you state. That's not the point. The point is that what you suggest is too much work. You aren't ever going to get people to add all your gratuitous lint-happiness inserts to all their docs. Therefore, the best you can do is autocheck what's there, and hand/eye-check whatever it doesn't like. Don't invent complicated new systems. You're overengineering technically and underengineering socially. When in down, use brute force--which, I suggest, is what you ought to do here. --tom
- Re: RFC: Automated Testing Of Code Examples In Documen... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Automated Testing Of Code Examples In Do... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC: Automated Testing Of Code Examples In Do... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Automated Testing Of Code Examples In Do... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC: Automated Testing Of Code Examples In Do... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Automated Testing Of Code Examples In Do... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC: Automated Testing Of Code Examples In Do... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC: Automated Testing Of Code Examples In Do... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC: Automated Testing Of Code Examples In Do... Barrie Slaymaker
- Re: RFC: Automated Testing Of Code Examples In Do... Michael G Schwern