Re: RFC: Automated Testing Of Code Examples In Documentation and "=for example"

[Tom Christiansen]

>On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 04:22:37PM -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote:
>> Too complicated.  Don't make people change anything.  Simply -cw syntax
>> check anything you can, and don't try to incite a revolution or onerous
>> burdens worrying about the fringe cases.  It's not important enough.

>Are you speaking of the idea as a whole, or simply what tests we
>should run on code examples?

All the pod crud.  It's bogus.   Simple run each code segment
through perl -wc.  No more.

>PS  Try to keep discussion of this on perl-qa only.

Since I'm not on the list, that seems a stupid thing to say.
And it was *YOU* who CC'd the THOU SHALT SAY NOTHING USEFUL list.
I merely answered your message.

--tom