Re: RFC: Automated Testing Of Code Examples In Documentation and "=for example"

[Barrie Slaymaker]

"Bryan C. Warnock" wrote:
> 
> Is each example to be standalone?  ie,

I'm thinking of this more as a testing tagset now:

=begin testing [<testfile>]

=end testing

=for testing [<testfile>]

where the optional <testfile> indicates the file to append
the indicated paragraphs to.

This plays well with using =also (for|begin|end) to let
examples be tested and included in documentation, I think.

> Or am I missing the point?

Not at all, we're just hashing out possibilities right now.

I'm thinking that =for example is probably a little off the mark,
and =for test combined with =also is closer.

- Barrie