On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:36:00AM -0500, Geoffrey Young ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
wrote:
> anyway, the point of this exercise is to present a few different options for
> augmenting Test::More's plan().  personally, I really, really like the way
> Apache::Test::plan() works,

I do, too, and I've been wanting this since I found out about how it
works at YAPC.  It just fell off my radar.

I would just ask that it be done as

   plan tests => $n, @list_of_conditions_to_be_met

I would hate to see the 3rd+ parms turn into a meta-language of stuff
like 

   plan tests => 14, needs => "Apache::Wango 1.14";

Rather, just make it "everything after must be true":

   plan tests => 14, have( "Foo::Wango" ), moon_phase eq "waning", etc;

xoxo,
Andy

-- 
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Reply via email to