Adrian Howard wrote: > > On 31 Jul 2007, at 11:56, Ovid wrote: > [snip] >> We can see right away from the report above that Test::Class will cause >> many folk's installs to fail since it's not listed as a prereq and it's >> possible that SUPER doesn't need as high a version as is listed, though >> investigation into the history for a version mismatch is warranted. >> >> Thoughts? > [snip] > > Would the modules that get lists that are not your prerequisites, but > are the prerequisites of the prerequisites of some of your prerequisites > be problematical?
I was about to say that. I declare LWP as a prereq, but loading LWP loads tons more modules. I don't have to declare all those as prereqs, in fact I should not as its violating LWP's encapsulation. I don't know an easy way to give it the necessary smarts.
