On 31 Jul 2007, at 13:39, David Golden wrote:
On 7/31/07, Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone think of anything wrong with the approach of replacing
require with an instrumented version? If the consensus is that that's
a sensible approach I'll play with tidying up the code.
This is the approach I thought of. I think you'll need to keep a
persistent file of output to capture require calls across each test
file and then summarize. (I.e. so you can set it as a command line
option to the harness.)
Yup, I'm just playing with it now. Seems that it'll do everything we
need of it. Lovely :)
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
