Re: Why not run a test without a plan?

[Chris Dolan]

On Dec 4, 2007, at 9:06 AM, David Golden wrote:

On Dec 4, 2007 12:40 AM, Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or maybe not reinvent the wheel and get tons of extra functionality
for free!
use base 'Test::Class';
sub block : Test(2) {

   ok(1, "wibble");
   ok(1, "wobble");
}

But if it goes into Test::More, it eventually goes into core.  :-)

David

Are you proposing that Test::Class go in core?  I second the  
motion!  :-)

Chris