> As you see, tr/// is not subject to the magic of 'use encoding'.
> jhi, have we made it so deliberately ? I am begging to think tr///
Not deliberately, no. I agree that making tr/// to understand
'use encoding' would be good.
> is happier to enbrace the power thereof.
>
> Still, it can be overcome by simple eval qq{} as illustrated. This
> much idiom would not hurt much, at least not as much as the Cookbook
> sample....
--
Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special
biologist word we use for 'stable'. It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen
