Sisyphus wrote: > Hi, > Is Apache now considered to be secure in a production environment on Windows > ? > > 12 months ago it wasn't. > > Sorry .... it's an OT thread .... it's already long enough .... I haven't > been following it .... the answer to my question has probably already been > given ..... and I'm too lazy to go check .... > > Looks like I'm doomed to live again. > (Still wouldn't mind a quick 'yea' or 'nay' to the question.)
The only warning I see now is a performance one: Warning: Apache on NT has not yet been optimized for performance. Apache still performs best, and is most reliable on Unix platforms. Over time NT performance has improved, and great progress is being made in the upcoming version 2.0 of Apache for the Windows platforms. Folks doing comparative reviews of webserver performance are still asked to compare against Apache on a Unix platform such as Solaris, FreeBSD, or Linux. -- ,-/- __ _ _ $Bill Luebkert ICQ=162126130 (_/ / ) // // DBE Collectibles Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] / ) /--< o // // http://dbecoll.tripod.com/ (Free site for Perl) -/-' /___/_<_</_</_ Castle of Medieval Myth & Magic http://www.todbe.com/ _______________________________________________ Perl-Win32-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
