On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, $Bill Luebkert wrote: > Brian Steele wrote: > > Well lessee, choosing between one that automatically uses file association, > > and one that offers it as a configurable option (the result being that > > you'll find it enabled on some servers but not on others - great for > > support!) .... I think I'll take door number one, Bill ;-). > > You're making a big deal out of one little feature of a server. How many Apache > servers have been compromised vs IIS ones ? How many of the hundreds of other > configuration options that Apache has does IIS have ? Apache runs on mucho > many playforms - how many does IIS run on ? When you start adding it all up, > you'll see why Apache is used by more web servers than IIS. > > > BTW - does PerlIS.dll work with Apache, or are you stick using Perl.exe? > > As already staed mod_perl would normally be used instead.
>> How many Apache servers have been compromised vs IIS ones ? Are you counting the Dos attacks related to the Apache Chunked Encoding overflow vulnerability? **** [EMAIL PROTECTED] <Carl Jolley> **** All opinions are my own and not necessarily those of my employer **** _______________________________________________ Perl-Win32-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
