Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 05:55 PM 8/1/00 -0400, John Tobey wrote:
> >Dan, you are completely missing my point. Okay, fine, non-inline may
> >be a performance win in some cases. Inline may be a win in others. I
> >am not proposing we mandate inlining in any case, I am proposing the
> >exact opposite: that we let the caller decide in every case.
>
> Having thought about it a bunch more (because of this) I'm proposing we let
> the compiler decide. The caller doesn't know enough to make that decision.
Read carefully. I said we *let* the caller decide, not *make* the
caller decide. What, specifically, disturbs you about my proposal?
--
John Tobey, late nite hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
\\\ ///
]]] With enough bugs, all eyes are shallow. [[[
/// \\\
