John Tobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> That sounds like a pre-judgement that inline form is prefered ;-) >> But actually most places (I looked when doing TIEARAY) perl itself calls >> nether it uses AvFILL() macro instead. > >As I understand myself, AvFILL == i_av_fill, so thank you for >confirming my pre-judgment. :-) No - one more time - your prejudgement may match perl5 - my point is PERL5 GOT IT WRONG (I think, and other hardware aware types Alan, Dan, ... seem to agree). It may have been right for a 3MHz 68000 based Sun3 but it isn't for UltraSPARC, Pentium-III, IA-64, ... -- Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- performance of inlined code (was Re: inline mania) Nick Ing-Simmons
- performance of inlined code (was Re: inline mania) John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Nick's performance theory - was "inline mania" Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Nick's performance theory - was "inline mania&qu... John Tobey