Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Tobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Bad assumption. How often is av_fill called? > > > >Only once in av_fill.c (generated by allfuncs.pl). In most other > >places, it's called as i_av_fill(). > > That sounds like a pre-judgement that inline form is prefered ;-) > But actually most places (I looked when doing TIEARAY) perl itself calls > nether it uses AvFILL() macro instead. As I understand myself, AvFILL == i_av_fill, so thank you for confirming my pre-judgment. :-) -- John Tobey, late nite hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \\\ /// ]]] With enough bugs, all eyes are shallow. [[[ /// \\\
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Nick Ing-Simmons
- performance of inlined code (was Re: inline mania) John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Re: inline mania John Tobey
- Re: inline mania Dan Sugalski
- Nick's performance theory - was "inline mania" Nick Ing-Simmons