Ken Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >When we document this, can we move the low level interfaces out of the >pod directory? It would be a shame to have people accidentally start using >the internal interfaces just because they're well documented. ;) If they are well documented then the risks they will be taking will be obvious. >(And if >we say something like "this is fast" people will ignore all the warnings.) As one of the worst offenders I certainly will ;-) > >- Ken -- Nick Ing-Simmons
- RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base format for perl Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base format f... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base form... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base ... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal b... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal b... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed inter... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base format f... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base form... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base form... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base ... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal b... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed inter... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed i... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A propos... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A propos... John Porter