Nick Ing-Simmons writes: : >It's not clear to me whether the intrinsic types should have a different : >solution to this than the extrinsic types. : : _This_ thread is about using vtables for intrinsic types. If we cannot : make them work there then the proposed innermost SV * replacment is flawed. Sure, but we may have to warp our ideas of what a vtable is to encompass the notion of a vtable that is the cross-product of two vtables. Larry
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base format for ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base format ... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base for... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base for... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base format for perl Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base format for ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base format for ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base format ... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base for... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal base... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed inte... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed inte... John Porter
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed internal... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed inte... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed inte... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed inte... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 35 (v1) A proposed inte... Dan Sugalski
- Typed Intermediate Language David L. Nicol
- Re: Typed Intermediate Language Dan Sugalski