On Sat, Aug 05, 2000 at 11:55:33PM -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote: > I was thinking of RFC'ing tri-state logic. Would it be worthwhile to > make it seperate or to extend your RFC? I had mantioned this before, I forget who to. I think it should be possible, but probably via a pragma; use tristate; I suspect that supporting booleans too would be very useful. Graham.
- Re: RFC 38 (v1) Standardise Handling Of Abnormal Number... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 38 (v1) Standardise Handling Of Abnormal Nu... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 38 (v1) Standardise Handling Of Abnorma... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 38 (v1) Standardise Handling Of Abn... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 38 (v1) Standardise Handling O... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 38 (v1) Standardise Handling Of Abnormal Nu... Hildo Biersma
- Re: RFC 38 (v1) Standardise Handling Of Abnorma... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 38 (v1) Standardise Handling Of Abn... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 38 (v1) Standardise Handling O... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 38 (v1) Standardise Handling O... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 38 (v1) Standardise Handling Of Abnormal Numbers Graham Barr