Re: RFC 38 (v1) Standardise Handling Of Abnormal Numbers

[Dan Sugalski]

At 10:19 AM 8/7/00 +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
>On Sat, Aug 05, 2000 at 11:55:33PM -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> > I was thinking of RFC'ing tri-state logic. Would it be worthwhile to
> > make it seperate or to extend your RFC?
>
>I had mantioned this before, I forget who to. I think it should be
>possible, but probably via a pragma;
>
>   use tristate;
>
>I suspect that supporting booleans too would be very useful.

Three value logic would be quite useful. Something to pass by Larry, I 
think. (I'd prefer undef to be the equivalent of NULL, but that has its own 
issues)

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk