On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 11:42:39AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 10:19 AM 8/7/00 +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
> >On Sat, Aug 05, 2000 at 11:55:33PM -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> > > I was thinking of RFC'ing tri-state logic. Would it be worthwhile to
> > > make it seperate or to extend your RFC?
> >
> >I had mantioned this before, I forget who to. I think it should be
> >possible, but probably via a pragma;
> >
> > use tristate;
> >
> >I suspect that supporting booleans too would be very useful.
>
> Three value logic would be quite useful. Something to pass by Larry, I
I have before to which he responded with something like, OK if it's with a pragma.
> think. (I'd prefer undef to be the equivalent of NULL, but that has its own
> issues)
I think thats what most people assume to be the third state. Given that DBI
translates NULL<->undef I think it would be a good choice.
Graham.
