On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 10:16:03AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At 10:01 AM 8/9/00 -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> >But for the generic object. The package itself can contain an indirection
> >table. This would be that sparse table with the offset in the object vtbl.
>
> That's going to be a very sparse table, though. It needs to have as many
> entries as there are sub names, be able to grow as new subs are defined,
> and have to be duplicated for each package.
>
> I can see that getting very big.
Maybe, maybe not. Your intuition might be backwards. ;-)
--
May the best description of competition prevail.
(via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank)
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" for SV etc. Dan Sugalski
- vector and matrix calculations in core? (was: Re: Rambli... Bart Lateur
- Re: vector and matrix calculations in core? (was: Re: Ra... Dan Sugalski
- Re: vector and matrix calculations in core? (was: Re: Ra... Bart Lateur
- Re: vector and matrix calculations in core? (was: Re: Ra... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" for SV etc. Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" for SV etc. Dan Sugalski
- Method call optimization. Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Method call optimization. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Method call optimization. Dan Sugalski
- Re: Method call optimization. Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Method call optimization. Dan Sugalski
- Re: Method call optimization. Graham Barr
- Re: Method call optimization. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Method call optimization. Graham Barr
- Re: Method call optimization. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Method call optimization. Damien Neil
- Re: Method call optimization. Dan Sugalski
- Re: Method call optimization. Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Method call optimization. Dan Sugalski
- Re: Method call optimization. Uri Guttman
