>>>>> "GB" == Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: GB> On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 10:01:46AM -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote: >> For the "my Dog $spot" case, that's not an issue, compile time resolution. GB> And why would an object of type Scotty which inherits from Dog not GB> be valid to assign to $spot. And if Scotty overrides some methods GB> you have a problem. Not an issue. The offset to the vtbl would be the same. The same named method would have the same slot. >> But for the generic object. The package itself can contain an indirection >> table. This would be that sparse table with the offset in the object vtbl. GB> You mean like a hash, sounds familiar. Yup. But the vtbl approach allows us to merge op calls and user sub calls into one method. <chaim> -- Chaim Frenkel Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
- Re: vector and matrix calculations in core? (was: Re: Ra... Bart Lateur
- Re: vector and matrix calculations in core? (was: Re: Ra... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" for SV etc. Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Ramblings on "base class" for SV etc. Dan Sugalski
- Method call optimization. Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Method call optimization. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Method call optimization. Dan Sugalski
- Re: Method call optimization. Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Method call optimization. Dan Sugalski
- Re: Method call optimization. Graham Barr
- Re: Method call optimization. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Method call optimization. Graham Barr
- Re: Method call optimization. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Method call optimization. Damien Neil
- Re: Method call optimization. Dan Sugalski
- Re: Method call optimization. Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Method call optimization. Dan Sugalski
- Re: Method call optimization. Uri Guttman
- Re: Method call optimization. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Method call optimization. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Method call optimization. Nick Ing-Simmons