At 08:16 PM 8/10/00 +0000, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: > >The first runtime reassignment of @ISA shoots this one down hard. Sorry. > >(MI also makes it more difficult, since dependency trees will have to be > >built...) > >Yes - this is why Malcolm dodged MI with 'fields' module. I'm not sure we can, or should, ultimately dodge MI. We have it, and it's ours to keep. (Lucky us...) Which isn't to say the answer can't be "MI sucks, here's the best band-aid we can manage", of course. :) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Method call optimization. Dan Sugalski
- Re: Method call optimization. Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Method call optimization. Dan Sugalski
- Re: Method call optimization. Graham Barr
- Re: Method call optimization. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Method call optimization. Graham Barr
- Re: Method call optimization. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Method call optimization. Damien Neil
- Re: Method call optimization. Dan Sugalski
- Re: Method call optimization. Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Method call optimization. Dan Sugalski
- Re: Method call optimization. Uri Guttman
- Re: Method call optimization. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Method call optimization. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Method call optimization. Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Method call optimization. Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Method call optimization. Dan Sugalski
- Re: Method call optimization. Graham Barr
- Re: Method call optimization. Dan Sugalski
- Re: Method call optimization. Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Method call optimization. Graham Barr