Uri Guttman wrote: > > the best fit is the TIL (threaded inline code) model we have > discussed. Yes! -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Bryan C . Warnock
- the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT David Corbin
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Ken Fox
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Ken Fox
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Uri Guttman
- Re: the C JIT John Porter
- Re: the C JIT John Porter
- Re: the C JIT John Porter
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Sam Tregar
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Tom Christiansen
