At 01:34 PM 10/17/00 -0400, Ken Fox wrote: >I think the general idea is that the advantages of C++ don't move us >far enough out of our comfortable local minimum to make it worthwhile. Yup, that pretty much covers it. C++ also has an awful lot of stuff in it that, while interesting, is too likely to be misused, or be really, really unfamiliar to too many people. (The perl guts are going to present enough problems for folks without adding all of C++'s potential idiosyncracies to the mix) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions Dan Sugalski
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions Chaim Frenkel
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions Dan Sugalski
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions David Mitchell
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions Dan Sugalski
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions ye, wei
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions Dan Sugalski
- Re: A tentative list of vtable function... ye, wei
- Re: A tentative list of vtable fun... Ken Fox
- Re: A tentative list of vtable... Dan Sugalski
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions David Mitchell
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions David Mitchell
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions David Mitchell
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions Bart Lateur
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions David Mitchell
- Re: A tentative list of vtable functions Jarkko Hietaniemi