On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:31:20AM -0500, Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs wrote:
> The patch assumes that your source code directory is named parrot.  This may
> have been an invalid assumption, but it is going to be hard to do this patch
> unless we agree on the name of the source directory.

That may be difficult.  I occasionally like to have multiple copies of the
source directory around for testing--usually parrot.orig and parrot.  I
suspect I'm not the only one.

Having the compile in the parrot.orig directory pick up the includes from
../parrot would be surprising, to say the least.

                          - Damien

Reply via email to