On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:31:20AM -0500, Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs wrote: > The patch assumes that your source code directory is named parrot. This may > have been an invalid assumption, but it is going to be hard to do this patch > unless we agree on the name of the source directory. That may be difficult. I occasionally like to have multiple copies of the source directory around for testing--usually parrot.orig and parrot. I suspect I'm not the only one. Having the compile in the parrot.orig directory pick up the includes from ../parrot would be surprising, to say the least. - Damien
- Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gregor N. Purdy
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Damien Neil
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Robert Spier
- Re: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gregor N. Purdy
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Dan Sugalski
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Andy Dougherty
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Dan Sugalski
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Brent Dax