At 01:03 PM 9/14/2001 -0400, Gregor N. Purdy wrote: >Gibbs -- > > > The patch assumes that your source code directory is named parrot. > > This may > > have been an invalid assumption, but it is going to be hard to do this > patch > > unless we agree on the name of the source directory. > >Ah. I try not to assume the source directory name, since folks might >rename it for various reasons (for instance, I always check out CVS >code as foo-cvs rather than just foo to call my attention to it in >its parent directory). I think that, if we're going to put the includes in the parrot subdir, there should be a parrot/ under the CVS root dir. Whether we put all the source there or not's a separate problem. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gregor N. Purdy
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- Re: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Damien Neil
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Robert Spier
- Re: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gregor N. Purdy
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Dan Sugalski
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Andy Dougherty
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Dan Sugalski
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Brent Dax
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Brent Dax
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Gregor N. Purdy
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs