[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) writes: > At 11:31 AM 9/14/2001 -0500, Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs wrote: > >The patch assumes that your source code directory is named parrot. This may > >have been an invalid assumption, but it is going to be hard to do this patch > >unless we agree on the name of the source directory. > > Hmmm. I think we need a reorg of the source directories, then. I'll > get with Simon and coordinate doing this. (It's going to make CVS > *so* happy... :) If you (or Simon) make a list of files that needs to be moved, then I can do it directly in the repository. It'll screw up old labels and the ability to checkout a copy from, say, last monday. But right now I would think that it is better to keep the revision history. - ask -- ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();
- Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gregor N. Purdy
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- Re: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Damien Neil
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Robert Spier
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gregor N. Purdy
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Dan Sugalski
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Andy Dougherty
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Dan Sugalski
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Brent Dax
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Brent Dax
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversion? Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: Half-completed parrot/parrot.h conversi... Gregor N. Purdy