On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 12:25:32PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Cool. If I get a chance (or someone else does) I'll see about hacking the > byteloader to translate to native format if handed a non-native but still > known set of bytecode. I think it's more urgent that we think about having the bytecode written in native IVs rather than 32 bits; that'll help Tru64 and all the other things with alignment problems. -- I used to be disgusted, now I find I'm just amused. -- Elvis Costello
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Jarkko Hietaniemi
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Hong Zhang
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Jarkko Hietaniemi
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Simon Cozens
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Simon Cozens
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Andy Dougherty
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Hong Zhang
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Andy Dougherty
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Andy Dougherty
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax