At 05:27 PM 9/19/2001 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: >On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 12:25:32PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > Cool. If I get a chance (or someone else does) I'll see about hacking the > > byteloader to translate to native format if handed a non-native but still > > known set of bytecode. > >I think it's more urgent that we think about having the bytecode written in >native IVs rather than 32 bits; that'll help Tru64 and all the other things >with alignment problems. Sure. That's a matter of getting assemble.pl using the right size for the chosen IV. Configure.pl probably ought to handle that somewhere. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Jarkko Hietaniemi
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Hong Zhang
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Jarkko Hietaniemi
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Simon Cozens
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Simon Cozens
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Andy Dougherty
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Hong Zhang
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Andy Dougherty
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Andy Dougherty
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Simon Cozens