Graham Barr wrote:
>
> I am of the opinion that only a class name should follow catch.
> If someone wants to catch based on an expression they should use
>
> catch {
> if (<expr>) {
> }
> else {
> # rethrow the error
> }
> }
Then you will be glad to know that RFC 88, in the not quite ready
version two release, allows you do to just that.
Yours, &c, Tony Olekshy
- RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do? Tony Olekshy
- Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do? Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do? Tony Olekshy
- Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do? Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do? Tony Olekshy
- Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } ... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" ... Tony Olekshy
- Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" ... Graham Barr
- Structured exception handling should be... Tony Olekshy
- Re: Structured exception handling s... Peter Scott
- Re: Structured exception handli... Tony Olekshy
- Re: Structured exception handli... Peter Scott
- Re: Structured exception handli... Tony Olekshy
- Re: Structured exception handli... Peter Scott
- Re: Structured exception handli... Tony Olekshy
