Messages by Date
-
2004/12/17
Re: $SIG{__DIE__} should be localized and cleared at the start of an eval block
PerlDiscuss - Perl Newsgroups and mailing lists
-
2000/10/01
RFC 96 (v2) A Base Class for Exception Objects
Perl6 RFC Librarian
-
2000/10/01
RFC 88 (v3) Omnibus Structured Exception/Error Handling Mechanism
Perl6 RFC Librarian
-
2000/10/01
RE: RFC 359 (v1) Improvement needed in error messages (both internal errors and die function).
David Grove
-
2000/09/30
RFC 359 (v1) Improvement needed in error messages (both internal errors and die function).
Perl6 RFC Librarian
-
2000/09/30
RFC 1 (v1) Improvement needed in error messages (both internal errors and die function).
Perl6 RFC Librarian
-
2000/09/28
RFC 119 (v4) Object neutral error handling via exceptions
Perl6 RFC Librarian
-
2000/09/14
RFC 119 (v3) Object neutral error handling via exceptions
Perl6 RFC Librarian
-
2000/09/14
RFC 80 (v3) Exception objects and classes for builtins
Perl6 RFC Librarian
-
2000/09/14
Re: $a in @b (RFC 199)
John Porter
-
2000/09/14
Re: $a in @b (RFC 199)
David L. Nicol
-
2000/09/13
RFC 151 (v3) Merge C<$!>, C<$^E>, C<$@> and C<$?>
Perl6 RFC Librarian
-
2000/09/07
Re: RFC 151 (v2) Merge C<$!>, C<$^E>, C<$@> and C<$?>
Peter Scott
-
2000/09/07
Re: RFC 151 (v2) Merge C<$!>, C<$^E>, C<$@> and C<$?>
Nathan Wiger
-
2000/09/06
RFC 151 (v2) Merge C<$!>, C<$^E>, C<$@> and C<$?>
Perl6 RFC Librarian
-
2000/08/29
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/29
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Tom Christiansen
-
2000/08/29
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/28
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/28
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/28
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/28
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/28
On RFC 88: Serendipity while throwing a string.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/27
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Bennett Todd
-
2000/08/27
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/27
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Bennett Todd
-
2000/08/27
RFC 88 version 3 draft 1 is available via http.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/26
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/25
Re: $SIG{__DIE__} should be localized and cleared at the start of an eval block
Tom Christiansen
-
2000/08/25
Re: $SIG{__DIE__} should be localized and cleared at the start of an eval block
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/25
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Bart Lateur
-
2000/08/25
$SIG{__DIE__} should be localized and cleared at the start of an eval block
Bart Lateur
-
2000/08/25
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/24
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/24
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/24
Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/24
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/24
Structured exception handling should be a core module.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/24
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/24
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Chaim Frenkel
-
2000/08/24
Re: Why "fatal" errors aren't special.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/24
Examples from RFC 88 redone using RFC 119 facilities [Was: Re: RFC 88 (v2) Omnibus Structured Exception/Error Handling Mechanism]
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/24
Re: Why "fatal" errors aren't special.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/24
Re: Why except and always should be a seperate RFC.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/24
Re: Why "fatal" errors aren't special.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/24
Re: Why $@ should be structured data.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/24
Re: RFC 119v2: Object neutral error handling via exceptions
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/24
Re: Exception handling [Was: Re: Things to remove]
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/24
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Jarkko Hietaniemi
-
2000/08/24
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Chaim Frenkel
-
2000/08/24
Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do?
Graham Barr
-
2000/08/24
Re: RFC 88 (v2) Omnibus Structured Exception/Error Handling Mechanism
Jonathan Scott Duff
-
2000/08/24
Re: RFC 88 (v2) Omnibus Structured Exception/Error Handling Mechanism
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/24
Re: RFC 88 (v2) Omnibus Structured Exception/Error Handling Mechanism
Jonathan Scott Duff
-
2000/08/24
Re: RFC 88 (v2) Omnibus Structured Exception/Error Handling Mechanism
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/24
Re: RFC 88 (v2) Omnibus Structured Exception/Error Handling Mechanism
Jonathan Scott Duff
-
2000/08/24
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/24
Re: RFC 63 (v4) Exception handling syntax
Ilya Martynov
-
2000/08/24
Re: RFC 63 (v4) Exception handling syntax
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/24
Re: RFC 63 (v4) Exception handling syntax
Ilya Martynov
-
2000/08/24
RFC 88 (v2) Omnibus Structured Exception/Error Handling Mechanism
Perl6 RFC Librarian
-
2000/08/24
RFC 63 (v4) Exception handling syntax
Perl6 RFC Librarian
-
2000/08/24
Re: RFC 119v2: Object neutral error handling via exceptions
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/24
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/24
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Re: Exception handling [Was: Re: Things to remove]
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Re: Why $@ should be structured data.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/23
RFC 88 version 2 is available via http.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Re: RFC 119v2: Object neutral error handling via exceptions
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Re: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Why except and always should be a seperate RFC.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Why "fatal" errors aren't special.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Why $@ should be structured data.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Chaim Frenkel
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/23
Checking error checking
Michael G Schwern
-
2000/08/23
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Michael G Schwern
-
2000/08/23
Re: Draft 3 of RFC 88 version 2.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/23
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Jarkko Hietaniemi
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/23
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/23
Re: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Chaim Frenkel
-
2000/08/23
Re: RFC 119v2: Object neutral error handling via exceptions
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/23
Re: RFC 119v2: Object neutral error handling via exceptions
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Markus Peter
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Re: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Markus Peter
-
2000/08/23
Re: RFC 119v2: Object neutral error handling via exceptions
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
RE: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.
Brust, Corwin
-
2000/08/23
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Jarkko Hietaniemi
-
2000/08/23
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Tom Christiansen
-
2000/08/23
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Jarkko Hietaniemi
-
2000/08/23
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/23
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring SystemCall Errors
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
Re: RFC 140 (v1) One Should Not Get Away With Ignoring System Call Errors
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/22
RFC 119 (v2) object neutral error handling via exceptions
Perl6 RFC Librarian
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/22
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/22
Re: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/22
Re: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
RFC 88: Description enhanced.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
RE: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.
Brust, Corwin
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
Re: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
RE: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.
Brust, Corwin
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
Re: Draft 3 of RFC 88 version 2.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Chaim Frenkel
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Markus Peter
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tom Christiansen
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/22
RE: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Markus Peter
-
2000/08/22
RE: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/22
Re: Draft 3 of RFC 88 version 2.
David L. Nicol
-
2000/08/22
Re: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
RE: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Brust, Corwin
-
2000/08/22
Re: Draft 3 of RFC 88 version 2.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Markus Peter
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/22
RE: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/22
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Markus Peter
-
2000/08/22
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Markus Peter
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Chaim Frenkel
-
2000/08/22
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Chaim Frenkel
-
2000/08/22
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/22
RE: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Brust, Corwin
-
2000/08/22
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Chaim Frenkel
-
2000/08/21
Re: On the case for exception-based error handling.
Chaim Frenkel
-
2000/08/21
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Dave Rolsky
-
2000/08/21
Re: RFC 88 v2 draft 5 is available via http.
Chaim Frenkel
-
2000/08/21
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Chaim Frenkel
-
2000/08/21
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Chaim Frenkel
-
2000/08/21
Re: Draft 3 of RFC 88 version 2.
Chaim Frenkel
-
2000/08/21
On the case for exception-based error handling.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/21
RE: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.
Brust, Corwin
-
2000/08/21
Re: Draft 2 of RFC 88 version 2.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/21
Re: Draft 2 of RFC 88 version 2.
Chaim Frenkel
-
2000/08/20
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/20
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/20
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/20
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Dave Rolsky
-
2000/08/20
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/20
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Dave Rolsky
-
2000/08/20
RFC 88 v2 draft 5 is available via http.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/20
Re: RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Glenn Linderman
-
2000/08/20
RFC 88: Possible problem with shared lexical scope.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/20
Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do?
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/20
Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do?
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/20
Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do?
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/20
Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do?
Graham Barr
-
2000/08/19
Re: Draft 3 of RFC 88 version 2.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/19
Re: Draft 3 of RFC 88 version 2.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/19
Re: Draft 3 of RFC 88 version 2.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/19
Re: Draft 3 of RFC 88 version 2.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/19
Re: Draft 3 of RFC 88 version 2.
Dave Rolsky
-
2000/08/19
Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do?
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/19
Re: RFC 88 Exceptions, Errors, and Inheritance.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/19
Re: RFC 88 Exceptions, Errors, and Inheritance.
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/19
Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do?
Peter Scott
-
2000/08/19
Draft 3 of RFC 88 version 2.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/18
Re: Draft 1 of RFC 88 version 2.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/18
Re: Draft 2 of RFC 88 version 2.
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/18
RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do?
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/18
Re: RFC 63
Tony Olekshy
-
2000/08/18
Re: Draft 2 of RFC 88 version 2.
Tony Olekshy