Peter Scott wrote: > > At 06:06 PM 8/24/00 -0600, Tony Olekshy wrote: > > > >In fact, not only would I be pleased and honoured to author the > >Perl 6 core Try.pm module, I'm already working on a Perl 5 standard > >reference implementation. > > >Peter, I think we should make this approach more clear in RFC 88. > > I'm not convinced that this can totally be implemented in a > module. Particularly if RFC 151 passes :-) I've read 151 a few times, and I don't understand how it can impact the implementation of RFC 88 as a module. Please explain. Yours, &c, Tony Olekshy
- RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do? Tony Olekshy
- Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do? Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } ... Tony Olekshy
- Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } do? Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" { } ... Tony Olekshy
- Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo" ... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo&qu... Tony Olekshy
- Re: RFC 88: What does catch "Foo&qu... Graham Barr
- Structured exception handling shoul... Tony Olekshy
- Re: Structured exception handli... Peter Scott
- Re: Structured exception ha... Tony Olekshy
- Re: Structured exception ha... Peter Scott
- Re: Structured exception ha... Tony Olekshy
- Re: Structured exception ha... Peter Scott
- Re: Structured exception ha... Tony Olekshy
- Re: Structured exception ha... Peter Scott
- Re: Structured exception ha... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Structured exception ha... Peter Scott
- Re: Structured exception ha... Bart Lateur
- Re: Structured exception ha... Peter Scott
- Re: Structured exception ha... Tony Olekshy