At 10:13 AM 8/25/00 +0200, Bart Lateur wrote: >You're citing my objection for merging in $@ with the rest of the error >variables. $@ currently is the "eval failed" flag, irrespective of what >else failed. We *must* have such a flag. If $@ and $! would be merged, >$! will have to be cleared if the eval doesn't fail, just like $@ is >now. Yes. Basically, you can think of the new $! as getting done to it whatever was last done to any of the set of $@, $!, $^E, and $? in the current Perl. Well, I doubt it will be that simple :-) -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
- Re: Structured exception handling should be a core module... Peter Scott
- Re: Structured exception handling should be a core m... Tony Olekshy
- Re: Structured exception handling should be a core m... Peter Scott
- Re: Structured exception handling should be a core m... Tony Olekshy
- Re: Structured exception handling should be a core m... Peter Scott
- Re: Structured exception handling should be a core m... Tony Olekshy
- Re: Structured exception handling should be a core m... Peter Scott
- Re: Structured exception handling should be a core m... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Structured exception handling should be a core m... Peter Scott
- Re: Structured exception handling should be a core m... Bart Lateur
- Re: Structured exception handling should be a core m... Peter Scott
- Re: Structured exception handling should be a core m... Tony Olekshy