On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 11:01:14PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Right, I know the underside will be yanked and redone. (Hopefully with > async support on platforms that have it to do some I/O and processing > overlap) It's not getting removed from the core language from a perl > programmer standpoint, though. Beefed up with disciplines and stuff, rather > than removed. Egads no. IO's what Perl's for. -- Calm down, it's *only* ones and zeroes.
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... J. David Blackstone
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Matt Sergeant
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Bart Lateur
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, on boo... J. David Blackstone
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Simon Cozens
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Simon Cozens
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl... Dan Sugalski
- Stuff in core (was Re: date inte... Simon Cozens
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Tim Bunce
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Tim Bunce
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Piers Cawley
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... J. David Blackstone
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Bryan C . Warnock