Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 09:39:28PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: >> I like perl's smart built-in IO just fine, thanks. :) Don't mind making it >> better, but I do mind making it optional. > >If we're going to do line disciplines, we need a built-in stdio replacement. >Full ground-up rewrite, like sfio but Perlish. I think that is almost a given - we have been on verge of doing it for perl5 for years. -- Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Simon Cozens
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl... Simon Cozens
- Re: date interface (was Re: ... Dan Sugalski
- Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Simon Cozens
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: d... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: d... Tim Bunce
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: d... Tim Bunce
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: d... Piers Cawley
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: d... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... J. David Blackstone
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Bryan C . Warnock
- Memory Footprint of Perl System Calls... mooring
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Nathan Torkington
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Damian Conway
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, on boo... Matt Sergeant
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, o... Hildo Biersma