Buddha Buck wrote: > The one concern I would raise about this is that a common use of multi-line > comments is to dyke out code. As such, it is handy to have the start and > end markers different, and allow nesting I see your point. At the risk getting too exotic how about: #<<EOC; some comments EOC This is less backwards compatable, however. --Michael
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Dan Sugalski
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Chaim Frenkel
- multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments Buddha Buck
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments Bart Lateur
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments Peter Scott
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen