Peter Scott wrote: > At 02:53 PM 8/2/00 -0400, John Porter wrote: > >Perhaps a better way would be a change in the semantics of scalar > >literals in void context, to be silently ignored. > > No! It's a major typo/bug-catcher. Strange, my experience does not confirm that one whit. -- John Porter
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments Buddha Buck
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments Bart Lateur
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments Peter Scott
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Roland Giersig