Peter Scott wrote:
> At 02:53 PM 8/2/00 -0400, John Porter wrote:
> >Perhaps a better way would be a change in the semantics of scalar
> >literals in void context, to be silently ignored.
> 
> No!  It's a major typo/bug-catcher.

Strange, my experience does not confirm that one whit.

-- 
John Porter

Reply via email to