>> What is wrong with >> >> if (0) { >> >> } >1) what if the block contains syntax errors? Then the compiler carefully and courteously notifies you of such. >2) what if the bloack contains unmatched braces? See above. >3) this is not easier to type or remember than the currently available >workarounds. Au contraire. It's *TRIVIAL* to remember, as it requires no new syntax and hacks and features and scoot-arounds. Likewise most of the rest of them. --tom
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments Bart Lateur
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments Peter Scott
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Roland Giersig
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Tom Christiansen
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Dan Sugalski
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Piers Cawley
- RE: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Nick Ing-Simmons