>> What is wrong with
>>
>> if (0) {
>>
>> }
>1) what if the block contains syntax errors?
Then the compiler carefully and courteously notifies you of such.
>2) what if the bloack contains unmatched braces?
See above.
>3) this is not easier to type or remember than the currently available
>workarounds.
Au contraire. It's *TRIVIAL* to remember, as it requires no new syntax
and hacks and features and scoot-arounds. Likewise most of the rest
of them.
--tom
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments Bart Lateur
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments Peter Scott
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Michael Mathews
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments John Porter
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: multiline comments Roland Giersig
- Re: multiline comments Tom Christiansen
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Tom Christiansen
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Dan Sugalski
- Re: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Piers Cawley
- RE: Typeglobs, filehandles, asterisks Nick Ing-Simmons
