> Thanks for the advice. Would "production" have been less likely to offend >than "real-world"? Perhaps. Or "conservative". Or "cautious". Or "paranoid". :-) --tom
- RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Peter Scott
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation John Porter
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Michael Stevens
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining p... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Michael Stevens
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining p... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defini... Michael Stevens
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defini... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-de... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuatio... Jon Ericson
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctu... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining p... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defini... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-de... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-de... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-de... Tim Jenness
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-de... Tom Christiansen
