Re: named parameters

[Piers Cawley]

Ken Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Nathan Wiger wrote:
> > Because it has opportunity for bloat, I would suggest it should be in a
> > pragma:
> > 
> >    use strict 'prototypes';
> 
> Bloat? What bloat? I don't want to *bloat* all my programs by sticking
> a zillion pragmas in just to turn on all the features that makes Perl 6
> different from Perl 5. If you want Perl 5 you know where to find
> it...

Or you could always have another pragma:

use perl5 'prototypes';

-- 
Piers