>Andy Wardley wrote: >> What about '$me'? It ties in nicely with 'my' (although perhaps for the >> wrong reasons), it's half as much typing as 'self' or 'this' and we get >> to annoy both sets of religious zealots at once. :-)= >Yes, absolutely. Now what good meanings could we attribute to $myself and $I Predefines ought to be all capped! --tom
- Re: named parameters Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: named parameters Ken Fox
- New Group proposed: subs (was Re: nam... Uri Guttman
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (wa... Spider Boardman
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (wa... skud
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (wa... Johan Vromans
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (was Re:... Damian Conway
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (wa... Hildo Biersma
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... Andy Wardley
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... Glenn Linderman
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... Tom Christiansen
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... J. David Blackstone
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... J. David Blackstone
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (wa... Kyle R . Burton
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... Peter Scott
- Re: New Group proposed: subs... Johan Vromans
- Re: New Group proposed: subs (wa... Damian Conway
- Re: named parameters Piers Cawley
- Re: named parameters Damian Conway
- Re: named parameters Tim Jenness
- Re: named parameters Damian Conway