Re: RFC 79 (v1) Code which is both executable and POD.

[John Porter]

Michael Mathews wrote:
> 
> I do consider this a potential alternative to the MLC RFC ...

I don't.  This RFC deals strictly with POD.  If a good in-line comment
solution is also implemented, so much the better; but orthogonal to
this.

> but to my mind it
> addresses the opposite problem: how to get executable code into a commenmt,
> rather than how to get executable code out of the program 

That's a very astute observation; and it's why the solutions may
reasonably be independent.

-- 
John Porter