Re: RFC 79 (v1) Code which is both executable and POD.

[John Porter]

Andy Dougherty wrote:
> 
> This is another instance where a macro preprocessor might be useful.
> ...
> Just hoping that looking at it from another skewed viewpoint may inspire
> someone,

Fine; but I hope people only see RFC 79 as an extension to POD, because
that's all it really is.  It does not attempt to address the in-line
comments issue -- and would fail if it did try, because that is a
issue with the whole of POD, even in the absence of RFC 79.

-- 
John Porter