At 05:23 AM 8/10/00 +1000, Damian Conway wrote: > > Of course, by the time Damian's done, perl won't actually *do* > > anything--you'll need to fire off another window and do a "kill > > -HEYYOUGETMOVING 23442" to actually make something happen... > >Actually, the plan is exactly the opposite. By the time I'm finished >everything will be done...in constant time! Sure, but being Quantum, we won't know how long that time is, or if we do we won't know what the answer is... (With all the lazy operations proposals, I can see the release slogan now: "Perl 6, the language for couch potatoes") Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Overloading && || Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Overloading && || Dan Sugalski
- Re: Overloading && || Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Overloading && || Dan Sugalski
- Re: Overloading && || Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Overloading && || David L. Nicol
- And A Parser In A Pared Tree ... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: And A Parser In A Pared T... David L. Nicol
- Re: Overloading && || Damian Conway
- Re: Overloading && || Damian Conway
- Re: Overloading && || Dan Sugalski
- Re: Overloading && || Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Overloading && || Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin string... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin st... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builti... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have bu... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should ha... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin string SCAL... Jeremy Howard