Re: RFC 244 (v1) Method calls should not suffer from the action on a distance

[Ilya Zakharevich]

On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 04:52:12PM -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote:
> Ok, you should clarify this. You're not suggesting that indirect object
> syntax be removed. You're suggesting that it should not accept
> barewords. These are two separate things.

Agreed.  I realized the ambiguity only after I posted it.

> Again, I think your RFC is far too terse and needs clarification. Make
> sure that you provide for telling people that this:
> 
>    $q = new CGI;
> 
> needs to now be written as this:
> 
>    $q = CGI->new;
> 
> in all cases.

Thanks.

Ilya