On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Casey R. Tweten wrote: > <opinion> > Not that there needs to be any discussion on this but IMHO things that > can reasonably live outside the core should. I heard somewhere that > most people think this way too. This is why there hasn't been much discussion on it -- there's not really much to discuss. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Simon Cozens
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andy Dougherty
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? James Mastros
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Casey R. Tweten
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andy Dougherty
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Bart Lateur
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? David Mitchell
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Michael G Schwern
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Simon Cozens
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? John Porter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail