Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM?

[abigail]

On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 10:18:19AM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Casey R. Tweten wrote:
> 
> > <opinion>
> > Not that there needs to be any discussion on this but IMHO things that
> > can reasonably live outside the core should.  I heard somewhere that
> > most people think this way too. 
> 
> This is why there hasn't been much discussion on it -- there's not really 
> much to discuss. 


Odd. I'd expect a lot of (pointless) discussion about it.

    "It's reasonable for `foo' to live outside of the core!"
    "No, it isn't!"
    "Yes, it is; I never use it!"
    "It should be in the core, I often use it!"


Abigail